* Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> [2012-11-06 14:27]: > > Just to be sure, could you try to use the "interface-specific" keyword > > for your filter? > > You should have tried that, it won't commit. It was first thing I tried > when testing VPLS.
Yeah, you're right. I remembered that it didn't matter but I was wrong. > Agreed. I was surprised by my results, infact so surprised I started to > doubt myself, so I just retested. nqe2 is sending traffic to nqe1, nqe1 > is not sending anything, so traffic is unidirectional. [...] > Here is what I'm seeing: http://ip.fi/uu42m.png Yes, cleary unshared. Btw: what traffic generator is that? Spirent? > > At the moment I only see the "solution" to have individual flood > > filters for every VPLS instance which makes large-scale deployment > > complicated (I wanted to apply a standard filter in an apply-group). > > Yes. I'm considering opening a bug for this but I fear it will be labled as "feature request". Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
