Not true. Logical interfaces are allocated to logical systems, not physical interfaces. No problem with what you're doing. On Jan 24, 2013 4:28 AM, "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve+juniper...@eintellego.net> wrote:
> Hey all, > > I want to build this scenario. > > 2 * MX80, with a trunk between then. > > On the trunk (as an example) there would be two VLANs. > > I would like to take VLAN 100 on Router-A Logical System A to Router-B > Logical System A, while at the same taking VLAN 200 on Router-A Logical > System B to Router-B Logical System B. > > Does this make sense? > > I'm hearing I have to allocate a whole physical interface to a Logical > System which means I can't use a VLAN from it for another Logical System. > > Does this make sense with what I am looking to do? > > Thanks ;-) > * > > * > *Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd > ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net > > Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/eintellego ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net > > The Experts Who The Experts Call > Juniper - Cisco – IBM - Brocade - Cloud > ----- > Check out our Juniper promotion website! eintellego.mx > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp