Not true. Logical interfaces are allocated to logical systems, not physical
interfaces. No problem with what you're doing.
On Jan 24, 2013 4:28 AM, "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve+juniper...@eintellego.net>
wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I want to build this scenario.
>
> 2 * MX80, with a trunk between then.
>
> On the trunk (as an example) there would be two VLANs.
>
> I would like to take VLAN 100 on Router-A Logical System A to Router-B
> Logical System A, while at the same taking VLAN 200 on Router-A Logical
> System B to Router-B Logical System B.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> I'm hearing I have to allocate a whole physical interface to a Logical
> System which means I can't use a VLAN from it for another Logical System.
>
> Does this make sense with what I am looking to do?
>
> Thanks ;-)
> *
>
> *
> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd
> ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
>
> Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellego ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco – IBM - Brocade - Cloud
> -----
> Check out our Juniper promotion website!  eintellego.mx
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to