I think at some point in the future there will be a virtualized Junos which can be deployed on a server, with limitations, but should be something that supports route reflection.
Juniper has JCS today but it's obviously not as small of a box as I would like. Phil On 4/15/13 12:20 PM, "Jeff Aitken" <jait...@aitken.com> wrote: >On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:47:41PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: >> ASR1001 with 16GB DRAM. What more do you want, really? > >Well, it fails my "must run IOS-XR or JUNOS" requirement, for starters. >;-) >And seriously, who wants to implement routing policy in IOS?! Bletch. > >What I want is something based on a generic compute platform, ala >JUNOSphere/VIRL. That lets me scale the control plane as big as I need >to, >avoids wasting money on purpose-built hardware optimized for forwarding, >and comes with the added bonus of using the same OS & policy language >that's already widely deployed in my network, so at least I don't get any >NEW interop issues. The downside is that neither vendor sells such a >thing >right now, and so we're stuck arguing about which square peg fits best >into >the round hole. ("small" ASR9k and MX here, FWIW) > >Oh and I also want a two-vendor solution so that I'm (hopefully) not >completely screwed the next time one of them discovers a new attribute- >handling bug. > > >--Jeff > >_______________________________________________ >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp