Hi Guys, If a provider already have ciena as transport with ip/mpls core on cisco ASR, why would they want to deploy CPT with mpls-tp?
Can we compare mpls-te vs mpls-tp or is this comparison of apples and oranges? I am new to mpls-tp and trying to understand in which area mpls-tp really help. it is said that mpls-tp has better oam features, its ipless but whats wrong if i have ip/mpls core, i have TE that provide all redundancy, can configure diverse paths, reserve bandwidth, all maintenance features like local repair. I will be thankful if you share your thoughts Regards _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp