On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 08:56:25 AM Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Right but this is actually for LACP not the VRRP.
Same. We have a ton of LACP-based LAG's between MX480's and EX4550's that are running VRRP with "accept-data". No problem. I will say that feature parity between native and LAG ports in Junos is very good, particularly in as far as QoS is concerned. I wish I could say the same about IOS and IOS XE :-(. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
