Right but with accept-data under lacp -the router accepts frames on a member-link where LACP is actually not up yet (if the whole AE bundle is up) This of course reduces the number of dropped packets when member links are enabled but it could possibly cause some loops in a pure L2 environment no? adam > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] > Sent: 20 January 2015 16:01 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Cc: Adam Vitkovsky; ashish verma > Subject: Re: Re: [j-nsp] LACP accept-data > > On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 08:56:25 AM Adam Vitkovsky > wrote: > > > Right but this is actually for LACP not the VRRP. > > Same. > > We have a ton of LACP-based LAG's between MX480's and > EX4550's that are running VRRP with "accept-data". No > problem. > > I will say that feature parity between native and LAG ports > in Junos is very good, particularly in as far as QoS is > concerned. > > I wish I could say the same about IOS and IOS XE :-(. > > Mark. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
