Eduardo,
I have tried the following for encapsulation on the ingress port. The
vpls connections are down...one in the LD status and the other in RD.
PE2 logical system configured identically other than using port ge-1/1/8
as ingress.
main instance:
ge-1/1/0 {
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
flexible-vlan-tagging;
}
on the PE1 logical system:
interfaces {
ge-1/1/0 {
unit 0 {
encapsulation vlan-vpls
vlan-id-range 1-4096
family vpls; (have tried with and without this)
}
}
then on the routing instance in PE1:
routing-instances {
VPLS1 {
instance-type vpls;
vlan-id all;
interface ge-1/1/0.0;
route-distinguisher 10.100.0.4:100;
vrf-target target:127:100;
protocols {
vpls {
site-range 4;
site CE1 {
site-identifier 1;
}
}
}
}
}
On 03/08/2015 01:37 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
Probably is your encapsulation on ingress port.
--
Eduardo
Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington <kw...@sofnet.com
<mailto:kw...@sofnet.com>> escreveu:
Hi,
On MX (Specifically MX80 w/12.3R9.4) is it possible to pass all
customer CE traffic whether it's tagged or untagged from a port on
PE1 to a port on PE2 using VPLS (BGP/RSVP)?
I have a lab system using logical systems with ports looped back and
I can get untagged traffic to work fine, but can't seem to get it to
pass everything through.
Thanks,
Kevin
_________________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/__mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>
--
Eduardo Schoedler
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
