Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones <jjo...@danrj.com> wrote: > The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year. > > On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following: > > > > 1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC > power > > > 2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhanced DPC for MX, requires optics sold > separately > > > > 1 x Juniper MS-DPC - IP services line card for MX Series Requires Junos OS > Release 9.3 and later > > > > > > Assuming we have the latest software version from Juniper to install on > this used box, is there anything we should know about this potential setup? > I believe this DPC cards are EOL, but I think many people are still using > them. I know there are more dense MIC cards out there, but that is not > needed at this time. > > > > I think everything about this system is redundant besides the MS-DPC, but I > could get another one of those too. > > > > Are there any licensing restrictions or upgrade restrictions I should be > aware of? Does Juniper have any locks or software limitations on these > larger routers like they do on the MX-5 through MX-80 and MX 104? > > > > Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or > consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is > too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960. > > > I would be upgrading from a MX80, so this is quite a jump. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp