All very good suggestions. Since I only need L3 termination, I think this is the easiest thing to do.
Thanks! On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Anderson <c...@wpi.edu> wrote: > Right, you aren't required to do bridging and IRB if all you want is a > layer 3 termination: > > ae0 { > flexible-vlan-tagging; > encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services; > unit 41 { > vlan-id 41; > family inet { > address 1.1.1.2/30; > } > } > } > > You can do the same on the EX side, or you can do a vlan l3-interface > on the EX side with the above on the MX side. > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:31:41PM -0800, Michael Loftis wrote: > > If you don't need to switch the subintf at all you can just do... > > set int ae0 flexible-vlan-tagging > > set int ae0 ..... > > set int ae0 unit 41 vlan-id family inet .... > > > > instead of doing encap vlan-bridge on the unit 41 and all the other > > related bridge-domain stuff > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I apologize for the basic question as I'm a new Junos user. I'm > attempting > > > to convert the following basic config from a Cisco NPE-G1: > > > > > > interface GigabitEthernet0/3 > > > desc 'Physical link to EX' > > > > > > interface GigabitEthernet0/3.41 > > > encapsulation dot1q > > > ip address 1.1.1.2/30 > > > > > > On the MX, I am trying to configure an agg between the MX and other > device > > > (EX), so this is the config that I have came up with: > > > > > > # interfaces > > > ae0 { > > > flexible-vlan-tagging; > > > encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services; > > > aggregated-ether-options { > > > lacp { > > > active; > > > periodic fast; > > > } > > > } > > > unit 41 { > > > encapsulation vlan-bridge; > > > vlan-id 41; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > # interfaces irb > > > irb { > > > unit 41 { > > > family inet { > > > address 1.1.1.2/30 > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > > > > > > > # bridge-domain > > > bridge-domains { > > > vlan41 { > > > vlan-id 41; > > > interface ae0.41; > > > routing-interface irb.41; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > Does this configuration look correct? Is all of this necessary? I > realize > > > there are several different ways to handle this in Junos. > > > > > > Thanks for any suggestions or input. > > > > > > Josh > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp