Well it would be RE-S-2000-4096 running the JTAC Recommended Junos Software Version Junos 13.3R8 plus the standard (not enhanced SCBs).
I know more memory and 64 bit is usually better, but how does this help in Junos? From past threads, we have concluded that Junos is currently single thread/core in most all situations, and the RE-S-2000-4096 is faster than the RE in a MX80 and MX104. What does the more cores and quadruple memory get you in the RE-S-1800X4-16G that you can not do on a RE-S-2000-4096? The use case for this box would be full BGP tables and routing with 4+ providers on 10G ports, plus a couple of ports to a peering exchange. I am wondering what features the DPC's lack in this situation. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Tom Storey <t...@snnap.net> wrote: > On 13 January 2016 at 22:32, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > A more current RE means you can run more recent Junos releases. I > > haven't run the RE-S-2000 in a while, so not sure how well it's > > supported by current Junos releases (someone else who has the older RE's > > might want to chime in). > > Guess it depends how old an RE you are talking about, and how recent JunOS? > > Have seen RE-S-2000's running 13.3. > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp