Hi Yes the price of MX Series is much higher.
From: Josh Reynolds [mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:27 AM To: Alireza Soltanian <soltan...@gmail.com> Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640 Any reason to not go with the MX line here? On Apr 10, 2016 11:55 PM, "Alireza Soltanian" <soltan...@gmail.com <mailto:soltan...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi everybody We are going to change our M320 router with T640. There are some concerns about supported features on T640. We need to have following features on this router: 1- GRE Tunnels 2- GRE Keepalive (OAM) 3- 802.1q over 802.1ad 4- MPLS TE 5- ATOM VLAN re-write We need to handle up to 80Gbps of traffic. Here is the setup: For Module setup we are going to use following FPC: - T640-FPC3-ES For Physical connections we are going to use following PICs: 1- PC-1XGE-TYPE3-XFP-IQ2 2- PC-1XGE-XENPAK For GRE tunnels we are going to use following PICs: PC-Tunnel For Routing Engine following item is considered: - RE- A-2000-4096-BB For SIB: - SIB-I-T640-B For Control Board: - CB-L-T And for Connector interface panel: - CIP-L-T640-S Is there anybody here who can guide me is this setup good or not and can I have the mentioned feature with T640? Also is there any note about required JunOS version of this setup? Thank you _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net <mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
