On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote:

> On 1 June 2016 at 20:32, Phil Rosenthal <p...@isprime.com> wrote:
> > I suspect that there is not that high of a risk of bugs due to this
> change, in all likelihood, the only changes required for this was a
> different compiler and perhaps the use of a few 64 bit instead of 32 bit
> variables — but even with a low risk of bugs, if there is no benefit, I’m
> not sure what the point of adding even a low risk of bugs.
>
> This is also not super new feature, it's been in shipping software for
> over two years.


So this means we're half way towards it being stable right....
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to