Nitzan, thank you very much, I'll keep that in mind. Anyway I can not understand how the router "eats" the packets without being counted ....That gives me panic! I can't find discarded packets anywhere!
JR. 2017-03-20 2:31 GMT-03:00 Nitzan Tzelniker <nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com>: > We saw a limitation around 40Gbps when running MX80 with RE based jflow > (inline works good ) we didnt got good explanation why it limit the traffic > so try to disable some features and see if it help > > Nitzan > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Javier Rodriguez < > rodriguezsot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mmm no, I think it doesn't work on MX80 / MX104. >> >> JR. >> >> >> 2017-03-19 23:14 GMT-03:00 Olivier Benghozi <olivier.bengh...@wifirst.fr >> >: >> >> > What about bypass-queuing-chip on MIC interfaces ? Would it work on >> > MX80/104 ? >> > >> > > On 20 march 2017 at 01:32, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote : >> > > >> > > Ok that's only 31Gbps total, without having any actual data, my best >> > > guess is that you're running through QX. Only quick reason I can come >> > > up for HW to limit on so modest traffic levels. >> > > >> > > On 20 March 2017 at 02:25, Javier Rodriguez < >> rodriguezsot...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> Soku, >> > >> >> > >> Maybe there was a misunderstanding , the inbound traffic on fpc2's >> LAG >> > was >> > >> 4Gbps , and the outbound traffic was 27Gbps aprox. That outbound >> traffic >> > >> enters by the fpc1 and fpc0. >> > >> It's IMIX traffic, the average packet size is 1250Bytes (out) >> 200Bytes >> > (in). >> > >> I tried to see dropped packets with "show precl-eng 5 statistics " >> and >> > "show >> > >> mqchip 0 drop stats" at pfe shell but it's 0. Does it save historical >> > data? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> <--27G-- | | <--27G-- >> > >> |FPC2 FPC 0/1 | >> > >> --4G--> | | --4G--> >> > >> >> > >> Regards, >> > >> >> > >> Javier. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> 2017-03-19 20:43 GMT-03:00 Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi>: >> > >>> >> > >>> Hey, >> > >>> >> > >>> There aren't multiple FPCs on the box really, there is only single >> MQ >> > >>> chip out of where all ports sit, usually MIC ports behind additional >> > >>> IX chip, which is not congested. It's architecturally single >> linecard >> > >>> fabricless box. >> > >>> You're saying you're pushing on the 4x10GE fixed ports 31+31Gbps, >> e.g. >> > >>> 62Gbps? It might be possible on (perhaps artificially) unfortunate >> > >>> cell alignment that it could be congested on so low values. Are all >> > >>> the packets same size, i.e is this lab scenario or just IMIX >> traffic? >> > >>> MQ pfe exceptions and MQ=>LU counters might be interesting to see. >> > >>> >> > >>> If you use QX chip, 62Gbps would be really good, QX chip is not >> > >>> dimensioned for line rate _unidir_ (i.e. can't do even 40Gbps). If >> you >> > >>> don't know if you're using QX or not, just deactive whole >> > >>> class-of-service and scheduer config in interfaces. >> > >>> >> > >>> On 20 March 2017 at 01:26, Javier Rodriguez < >> rodriguezsot...@gmail.com >> > > >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>>> Hi, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks for your reply Saku. >> > >>>> The problem is that fpc2 (fixed ports) can't overcome 31Gbps (in + >> > out) >> > >>>> with 6Mpps. The graph shows a straight line as if it were being >> > limited. >> > >>>> I have moved some interfaces from LAG to fpc1 and fpc0 and the >> traffic >> > >>>> has >> > >>>> incresed. (It only has a tunnel-service in fpc0 of 1g) >> > >>>> It's as if it were being limited by the MQ, but I do not see >> discarded >> > >>>> packages, or I do not know where to look at them. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> JR. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> 2017-03-19 6:53 GMT-03:00 Saku Ytti <y...@ntt.net>: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Hey Javier, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> MX104 and MX80 (1st gen Trio MQ/LU) should do about 55Mpps and >> 75Gbps >> > >>>>> (in+out). >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On 19 March 2017 at 09:12, Javier Rodriguez < >> > rodriguezsot...@gmail.com> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I need a bit of your knowledge. >> > >>>>>> I have a MX104 as PE router with 4 LAGs. >> > >>>>>> One LAG facing to P router on FPC2 (fixed ports). The other LAGs >> > >>>>>> distributed in FPC0 and FPC1. >> > >>>>>> The problem is that traffic is being limited when reach 28G out/ >> 4G >> > >>>>>> in >> > >>>>>> (31Gbps total). >> > >>>>>> I changed one interface (10G) of the LAG (to P router) to FPC1 >> and >> > >>>>>> the >> > >>>>>> traffic has grown a little more. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Where is the limitation? In the MQ chip? >> > >>>>>> Where can I see those discarded packages? >> > >>>>>> How much traffic will the router support on FPC2? >> > >>>>>> Where could I get a graphic of its internal architecture? >> > >>>>>> Does a MX80 have the same behavior? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Atte. >> >> Javier I. RodrÃguez Sotelo >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > -- Atte. Javier I. RodrÃguez Sotelo _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp