I would be looking at the QFX10K or the QFX52xx series. Chat with your account team for the latest.
Jared Mauch > On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Fulton <s...@lists.esoteric.ca> wrote: > > Jason, > > For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204 > for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks like break > out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces. > > -- Stephen > >> On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: >> Hey there, >> I’m looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco >> kit that’s out there. >> For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP BGP-Free P Core >> LSR. QFX5110 seem to be closest. Fair? >> For a NCS5501-SE comparison, the use case would be for a peering router with >> a big FIB, ISIS, LDP and MP-BGP. I’m having a hard time finding a >> comparison in the same form factor. Is there one? >> Finally, for the ASR9001 comparison, the use case would be the same as the >> NCS5001-SE case, but for much, much smaller sites. On paper, it looks as >> though the MX80 would be the direct comparison here? >> Thanks folks! >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
