Since of the fathers. 'Cisco did it'.
I also see no value in it. On 5 April 2018 at 11:38, Thomas Bellman <bell...@nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On 2018-04-04 21:09, Niall Donaghy wrote: > >> Even more sad to see that 1G ports retain their xe- naming rather than >> changing to ge- as you would hope and expect. > > I have never understood the reason for having different names for > ports depending on the speed of the transceiver. To me, it just > makes things more confusing. > > Can someone enlighten me on the benefits of that? > > > /Bellman > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
