Hi Aaron,
Possibly it could, but it definitely needs to be checked and tested
about possibility of unequal load-balancing. As far as next-hop tooling
required anyway to process those prefixes in a different way than other
announced from PEs, and traffic is actually sent via rsvp tunnels,
probably the outcome will be just replacing one kind of complexity with
another. It will be interesting to test though.
BTW, thanks to all who replied! Looks like one of my previous messages
didn't reach the list.
Kind regards
Andrey
Aaron Gould писал 30.07.2018 13:37:
".... so for traffic load-balancing we change next-hop to anycast
loopback
address shared by those two PE and use dedicated LSPs to that IP with
"no-install" for real PE loopback addresses"
Did you have to use this anycast method?... just wondering if bgp
multipathing would've worked in this case also...and if so, why was
one
method chose over the other
-Aaron
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
