On 17/Aug/18 15:39, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > Another alternative would be to spin up a separate BGP process, which I think > is supported only in XR, but once again that somewhat places one on the > outskirts of the common deployment graph. > But I know Mark is using csr1k -so depending on the available NFVI resources > (I guess dedicated servers in this case), I think it's not that onerous to > spin up yet another VM right? Turning another one up? Not a problem at all. The issue is in operating more than you need to. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same router tim tiriche
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same router Alexander Marhold
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same router adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same router Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same route... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same r... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same r... sthaug
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on S... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same r... adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on S... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] L3VPN/R... Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] L3V... adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] ... Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] ... adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same route... Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on Same r... adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE on S... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR/PE ... Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN/RR... adamv0025