jvm-languages  

Messages by Date

• 2009/04/02 [jvm-l] Re: Tail calls kirk
• 2009/04/02 [jvm-l] Re: Tail calls Jon Harrop
• 2009/04/02 [jvm-l] Re: Tail calls Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/04/02 [jvm-l] Re: Tail calls Patrick Wright
• 2009/04/02 [jvm-l] Tail calls Jon Harrop
• 2009/03/21 [jvm-l] Re: JMM Safe Publication Neil Bartlett
• 2009/03/21 [jvm-l] Re: JMM Safe Publication Christian Vest Hansen
• 2009/03/21 [jvm-l] JMM Safe Publication Brian Frank
• 2009/03/21 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/03/21 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Brian Frank
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package John Rose
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Colin Walters
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Julien KIRCH est absent / Julien KIRCH is offsite. julien . kirch
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package John Wilson
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Neil Bartlett
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Jim Baker
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Re: Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package John Cowan
• 2009/03/20 [jvm-l] Pain point: getting the classes of a Java package Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Robert Fischer
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Robert Fischer
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? James Abley
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Robert Fischer
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Robert Fischer
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] Re: SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/13 [jvm-l] SSA/CPS transformation for JVM languges? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/11 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/11 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Rose
• 2009/03/11 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/11 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Rose
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Rémi Forax
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Rose
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Rose
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Tobias Ivarsson
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Rose
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Rose
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? John Cowan
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Patrick Wright
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Attila Szegedi
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] Re: do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Robert Fischer
• 2009/03/10 [jvm-l] do we need a new kind of VM-supported references? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/03/02 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays byhisdeeds
• 2009/03/02 [jvm-l] blog entries on JavaFX REPL and scripting Per Bothner
• 2009/03/02 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays John Rose
• 2009/03/02 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays Randall R Schulz
• 2009/03/01 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays John Rose
• 2009/03/01 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays John Cowan
• 2009/02/28 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays Randall R Schulz
• 2009/02/28 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays Philip Jenvey
• 2009/02/25 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Bill Robertson
• 2009/02/25 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/02/25 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? John Rose
• 2009/02/25 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Matt Fowles
• 2009/02/25 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays byhisdeeds
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? John Cowan
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Matt Fowles
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? John Cowan
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? John Cowan
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Matt Fowles
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Robert Fischer
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Patrick Wright
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Re: Optimizations? Patrick Wright
• 2009/02/24 [jvm-l] Optimizations? Robert Fischer
• 2009/02/22 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays Bill Robertson
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters John Cowan
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Robert Fischer
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters John Wilson
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Robert Fischer
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Robert Fischer
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters John Wilson
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Ben Schulz
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters John Wilson
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Ben Schulz
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters John Wilson
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays Rémi Forax
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Performance of ByteBuffers vs Arrays byhisdeeds
• 2009/02/20 [jvm-l] Re: How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Paul de Vrieze
• 2009/02/19 [jvm-l] How to convert a Strings into Control Characters Robert Fischer
• 2009/02/02 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? David Welton
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Joseph Wofford
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Robert Fischer
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? David MacIver
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Jon Harrop
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Robert Fischer
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Attila Szegedi
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Jon Harrop
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? John D. Mitchell
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? John D. Mitchell
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Thomas E Enebo
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: Automatic local variable initialization for methods Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Robert Fischer
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? John Wilson
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? David Welton
• 2009/01/28 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? John Wilson
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Tim Bray
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? John D. Mitchell
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Brian Schlining
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: Kawa Scheme on Android Per Bothner
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Ben Evans
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] [OT (kinda)] Language Adoption? Robert Fischer
• 2009/01/27 [jvm-l] Re: Kawa Scheme on Android David Welton
• 2009/01/23 [jvm-l] [ANN] Ioke S released Ola Bini
• 2009/01/22 [jvm-l] Re: Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work John Rose
• 2009/01/22 [jvm-l] Re: Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work Attila Szegedi
• 2009/01/21 [jvm-l] Re: Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work John Rose
• 2009/01/21 [jvm-l] Re: Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work John Rose
• 2009/01/21 [jvm-l] Re: Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work Patrick Wright
• 2009/01/21 [jvm-l] Re: Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/21 [jvm-l] Updates on Da Vinci Machine Work Patrick Wright
• 2009/01/20 [jvm-l] Re: Automatic local variable initialization for methods Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/20 [jvm-l] Re: Automatic local variable initialization for methods Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/20 [jvm-l] Re: Automatic local variable initialization for methods Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/20 [jvm-l] Automatic local variable initialization for methods Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/20 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Neal Gafter
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Neal Gafter
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? John Wilson
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Rémi Forax
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] Re: handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? John Wilson
• 2009/01/19 [jvm-l] handling of synthetic abstract methods by javac correct? Jochen Theodorou
• 2009/01/18 [jvm-l] Re: Kawa Scheme on Android Per Bothner
• 2009/01/13 [jvm-l] Re: Using Kawa as an IR / Codegen solution Per Bothner
• 2009/01/13 [jvm-l] Using Kawa as an IR / Codegen solution Ben Evans
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Mark Haniford
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: boojay is back on track Patrick Wright
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] boojay is back on track Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2009/01/12 [jvm-l] Re: [ANN] Ioke 0 released Ola Bini
• 2009/01/11 [jvm-l] Re: [ANN] Ioke 0 released John Cowan
• 2009/01/11 JAVA HAZ LOLCODE (was Re: [jvm-l] Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java) Jim White
• 2009/01/11 [jvm-l] Re: [ANN] Ioke 0 released Ted Neward
• 2009/01/11 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Liwei
• 2009/01/11 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Liwei
• 2009/01/11 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Jon Harrop
• 2009/01/11 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Liwei
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Jon Harrop
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Jon Harrop
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Jon Harrop
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Re: Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java Eugene Kuleshov
• 2009/01/10 [jvm-l] Brainfuck interpreter and jit-compiler in Java sleepnova
• 2009/01/05 [jvm-l] Re: Kawa Scheme on Android Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2008/12/28 [jvm-l] Kawa Scheme on Android Per Bothner
• 2008/12/24 [jvm-l] Re: [ANN] Ioke 0 released Ola Bini
• 2008/12/23 [jvm-l] Re: [ANN] Ioke 0 released John Cowan
• 2008/12/23 [jvm-l] [ANN] Ioke 0 released Ola Bini
• 2008/12/21 [jvm-l] Re: binary snapshot of openjdk7 (with invokedynamic)? Jim White
• 2008/12/21 [jvm-l] Re: binary snapshot of openjdk7 (with invokedynamic)? Iulian Dragos

• Earlier messages
• Later messages