Attila Szegedi a écrit : > On 2008.01.15., at 6:30, Ted Neward wrote: > > >> +1. >> >> But adding this to the GCMXBean would mean changing that interface, >> and that >> gets into all sorts of versioning problems. >> > > Well, the implementation itself is usually provided by the JVM, so it > shouldn't be a too big a problem. Still, I see your point. > > >> Perhaps a better way would be to >> create a new GCMXBean interface (let's call it >> GarbageCollectorMXBean2 just >> for cruelty's sake) >> > > You just reminded me of good ol' COM programming days: IClassFactory, > IClassFactory2. I think some DirectX interfaces actually reached into > threes... > COM is so old school, some eclipse interfaces are numbered seven or height (and some in the middle are deprecated). Interfaces version is actually a real pain and there is no real solution. > Attila. > Rémi
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
