Wow - thanks for pointing this out; just learned something new. That's indeed a quite amazing improvement...
Attila. On 2008.01.30., at 16:58, Rémi Forax wrote: > > Attila Szegedi a écrit : >> I'll admit to have limited knowledge of j.l.instrument (and right now >> not even enough time to read through the API docs), but doesn't that >> allow hooking into the class definition process only? > not only >> It still >> wouldn't allow you to hot-replace code of an already defined class >> AFAIK (I might be wrong), > you are wrong :) >> which I believe is the "Eclipse capability" >> the poster I replied to talked about. >> > i think so. >> Attila. >> > it's a 1.6 feature: > http://download.java.net/jdk7/docs/api/java/lang/instrument/Instrumentation.html#retransformClasses(java.lang.Class...) > > Rémi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
