Richard Warburton wrote: > Just an observation - but if you are looking for listing a variety of > languages then I would be inclined to list things that are highly > distinct. For example, listing both Jython and JRuby seems somewhat > redundant. Obviously they are both distinct implementations, with > differing groups - but is there really that much novelty to the > implementation of one compared to the other? Perhaps just go with > JRuby.
Yes, you make a good point. Whatever list eventually comes out of it I'll probably group them by what challenges they face, and try to draw out the commonality between them as areas we're working together. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
