It seems that everyone has put Scala in their top 5 :-). So either we were all introduced to the this group through the Scala community, or we're in for some glorious objected oriented functional times. I'd like to see a graph of the trends of these fledgling languages. Perhaps using mailing lists as a metric until usage picks up enough to measure jobs and such.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Patrick Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hard to narrow it down, but > > Scala > Kawa > Pnuts > Talc - > F3 - such a good name :) > > Re: Kawa, I'm specifically interested in the reusable language > infrastructure that underlies it, which seems like a big plus--oddly > enough, even used in one attempt for Perl on the JVM, see - > http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn/writings/technical/thesis/node40.html for > example. I think it's a good example of the sort of learn-and-share > approach by language designers and developers which in the long run is > as important, if not more important, than bragging right about how > many languages run on the JVM. > > > > > Cheers > Patrick > > PS: CAL, Fan, Clojure, Nice > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
