> > Is there a way to run Groovy so that it would not need to be signed? > > Not as far as I know. > I guess it'd require a fair amount of work to allow that.
Just to make sure I understand - does this apply to interpreted Groovy *and* Groovy that is compiled to bytecode, or just interpreted Groovy? On another topic: I'm also interested in using JavaScript in an applet. I can't use the version of Rhino that ships with Java 6 because Apple doesn't include it (and Apple doesn't support Java 6 in applets yet anyways). Does anyone know if it is possible to use Mozilla's Rhino implementation in "unoptimized" (interpreted) mode to implement a single interface at a time without requiring class generation? This article mentions that Sun's version limits JavaScript to implementing a single interface to work around the class generation issue, but it doesn't say whether or not Mozilla's Rhino will always use class generation even in simpler cases that may not require it: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/scripting/programmer_guide/index.html If Mozilla Rhino always uses class generation, is Sun's version available for download separately anywhere, so I can include it with an applet? Thanks, Greg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
