Good luck with that. All previous attempts run into very ugly problems in implementing lazy evaluation (and no, tail calls won't solve that).
Don't get me wrong, it'd be awesome to have good Haskell on JVM, but I'm fairly sceptical whether it can be done. I'd be delighted to be proven wrong, though. Attila. On 2009.06.25., at 21:07, Nick Sieger wrote: > > Cross-linking this post on haskell-cafe, since there's likely to be a > JVM guru lurking here who might be interested in helping to bootstrap > Haskell on the JVM: > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2009-June/063454.html > > Cheers, > /Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
