On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Attila Szegedi<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd be delighted to see someone smarter than me > overcome these problems for having an *efficient* Haskell on the JVM > implemented *elegantly*. That'd really rock. That might be too much to ask, given that GHC is an efficient but highly inelegant (per your description) implementation of Haskell on the C VM. :-) -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
