On Jul 13, 1:00 am, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you'll find that Scala has already beaten you to it! > > As a language, it already supports many of your requested features, or the > ability to implement them via an internal DSL.
Hi, I had a quick look at Scala. Unfortunately it is not what I am after: I want a small language, that is even simpler than Java. Scala is a big language with lots of features that I don't need. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
