jvm-languages  

Messages by Date

• 2010/12/12 Re: [jvm-l] Redline: Smalltalk in 'small talks' ... Robert Fischer
• 2010/12/12 Re: [jvm-l] Redline: Smalltalk in 'small talks' ... Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/11 [jvm-l] Redline: Smalltalk in 'small talks' ... jamesl
• 2010/12/11 [jvm-l] Re: request for advice: safepoints in the JSR 292 spec Rich Hickey
• 2010/12/10 [jvm-l] Re: request for advice: safepoints in the JSR 292 spec John Rose
• 2010/12/10 [jvm-l] Re: request for advice: safepoints in the JSR 292 spec Doug Lea
• 2010/12/09 [jvm-l] request for advice: safepoints in the JSR 292 spec John Rose
• 2010/12/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/12/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/05 [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
• 2010/12/05 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/05 [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
• 2010/12/05 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/05 [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
• 2010/12/05 [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
• 2010/12/04 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/04 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Guillaume Laforge
• 2010/12/04 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/12/04 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/04 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/12/04 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/12/03 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects [email protected]
• 2010/12/03 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/03 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects John Rose
• 2010/12/01 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/12/01 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/12/01 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/12/01 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Kevin Wright
• 2010/11/30 Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/11/30 [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects [email protected]
• 2010/11/30 [jvm-l] primitives as objects Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/11/19 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Kirk
• 2010/11/19 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community John Cowan
• 2010/11/19 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/19 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/19 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/19 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community David MacIver
• 2010/11/18 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Kirk
• 2010/11/18 [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community JerryG
• 2010/11/18 Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community John Rose
• 2010/11/18 Re: [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Jim Baker
• 2010/11/18 [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Lucky
• 2010/11/18 [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community jamesl
• 2010/11/18 [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/16 Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? John Rose
• 2010/11/15 Re: [jvm-l] classfile reading tool Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/15 Re: [jvm-l] classfile reading tool iulian dragos
• 2010/11/15 Re: [jvm-l] classfile reading tool Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/15 [jvm-l] classfile reading tool iulian dragos
• 2010/11/11 Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code iulian dragos
• 2010/11/10 Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code John Rose
• 2010/11/10 Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code James Abley
• 2010/11/10 [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code iulian dragos
• 2010/11/09 Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/09 Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/09 Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Hannes Wallnoefer
• 2010/11/09 [jvm-l] Re: JVM options to turn server into client? ijuma
• 2010/11/09 [jvm-l] Re: JVM options to turn server into client? ijuma
• 2010/11/09 Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/08 [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/11/08 Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/06 Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java John Rose
• 2010/11/06 Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java Rémi Forax
• 2010/11/06 Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java John Rose
• 2010/11/06 [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java Rémi Forax
• 2010/10/12 [jvm-l] Stable and stationary values Ian Rogers
• 2010/10/12 Re: [jvm-l] categorical subclasses John Rose
• 2010/10/12 Re: [jvm-l] categorical subclasses Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/11 [jvm-l] categorical subclasses John Rose
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/08 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Rémi Forax
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError John Wilson
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError John Wilson
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/07 [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/03 Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Per Bothner
• 2010/10/03 Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/02 Re: [jvm-l] Callsite Invalidation [Was] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? John Rose
• 2010/10/02 Re: [jvm-l] Callsite Invalidation [Was] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? John Rose
• 2010/10/02 Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/10/02 Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/02 Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Rémi Forax
• 2010/10/02 [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/10/01 Re: [jvm-l] Callsite Invalidation [Was] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/10/01 Re: [jvm-l] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? John Rose
• 2010/10/01 Re: [jvm-l] Callsite Invalidation [Was] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? Rémi Forax
• 2010/10/01 Re: [jvm-l] Callsite Invalidation [Was] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? John Rose
• 2010/10/01 Re: [jvm-l] Callsite Invalidation [Was] concurrency problems, is the JVM missing something here? John Rose
• 2010/09/25 Re: [jvm-l] More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/23 [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/23 [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/22 [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
• 2010/09/22 [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/22 [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/19 [jvm-l] Update on Ravi Programming Language Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/18 [jvm-l] More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/13 [jvm-l] Re: Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/13 [jvm-l] Re: Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Ben Schulz
• 2010/09/13 [jvm-l] Re: Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/13 Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
• 2010/09/13 Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? John Cowan
• 2010/09/13 Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
• 2010/09/13 Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Christian Vest Hansen
• 2010/09/13 Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
• 2010/09/13 Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
• 2010/09/13 [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/12 [jvm-l] Re: Using ANTLR Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/12 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Using ANTLR Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/12 [jvm-l] Re: Using ANTLR Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/12 Re: [jvm-l] Using ANTLR Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2010/09/12 [jvm-l] Using ANTLR Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/11 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
• 2010/09/11 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/11 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster John Cowan
• 2010/09/11 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
• 2010/09/11 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Matt Fowles
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/10 Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Matt Fowles
• 2010/09/10 [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/09 Re: [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/09/09 Re: [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/09 Re: [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Jochen Theodorou
• 2010/09/08 [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/08 [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly John Rose
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
• 2010/09/08 [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Brian Frank
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/08 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
• 2010/09/08 [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/08 [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/07 [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/07 Re: [jvm-l] Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/07 [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/07 [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/07 [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/07 Re: [jvm-l] Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Matt Fowles
• 2010/09/07 [jvm-l] Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/07 Re: [jvm-l] Naming the new language Charles Oliver Nutter
• 2010/09/07 Re: [jvm-l] Naming the new language Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Angel Java Lopez
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM John Cowan
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM John Wilson
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Per Bothner
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Kirk
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Angel Java Lopez
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Attila Szegedi
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Rémi Forax
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Attila Szegedi
• 2010/09/06 [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Tom Davies
• 2010/09/06 Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Patrick Wright
• 2010/09/05 Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Ben Evans
• 2010/09/05 Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Jim White

• Earlier messages
• Later messages