On Jul 13, 10:08 pm, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I hope we can both work to collaborate. There may be common > inference or backend logic we can reuse, or perhaps one of our > codebases might eventually form a better base for both language > implementations to use. > > Feel free to ask any questions about Mirah (which *was* Duby, but > recently changed names).
Thanks very much; would love to collaborate. > > Goroutines are nice but cannot be implemented efficiently I think. So > > am happy to settle for standard threadpool type implementation. > > Do have a look at this: > > http://classparser.blogspot.com/2010/04/jruby-coroutines-really-fast.... > > This is the performance of JRuby wired into Lucas Stadler's native > coroutines for the JVM. It's research work at the moment and won't be > in Java 7, but it could easily form the basis of Goroutines for your > implementation. More people hacking on it and demanding it would help > drive it into Java proper. Nice. I shall have a deeper look at it. I think it would be great if the JVM supported this. Regards Dibyendu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
