On Sep 6, 8:03 am, Patrick Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> I found the implementations of Talc (http://code.google.com/p/talc/)
> and Pnuts (https://pnuts.dev.java.net/) fairly small and easy to
> follow. I wouldn't call them toy languages or toy implementations but
> the code is not overwhelming, I think.

>From an initial look, Talc looks really something that I can learn
from;
its got a few similarities with Go as well (such as type inference).

Thanks very much!

Regards

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.

Reply via email to