On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jim Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Remi, you may be right - maybe we just need to continue to generate naive > bytecode and let the JVM sort it out. Just somewhat better naive bytecode, > that's all. It's always good to remember that Java JITs are designed to optimize "dumb, enterprisey Java", so clever Java/bytecode generation can be self-defeating. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
