Igor: What I'd suggest is that Kaboodle actually *takes* its timestamp *from* the WinVNC log file directly, not via a system call. That way they'll match perfectly.
-Scott On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > Hello Scott. > > About files merging. > Kaboodle can keep its own log file. > But how we can to merge that file with the WinVNC log file? > The WinVNC log file keep time as *Wed Sep 04 12:00:26 2002*. > It isn't enough precision (only 1 second) to identify data between above log > files. > If Kaboodle will use the same timestamp with precision only 1 second, > then KaboodlePad sometime will show invalid data. > It's better didn't show any data, than show invalid data. > The WinVNC log file isn't a facility for safety controlling: > - the WinVNC creates new own log file every time at starting, > - if a user starts WinVNC from command line or from Windows system menu, > then placement of WinVNC log file is by accident (the current directory). > It's possible to split KaboodlePad's window on 2 separate windows > and then show each log file in own window. > > About an "Autostart Now" button. I'll do that. > > - Igor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:32 AM > Subject: Re: WinVNC log file > > > > Igor: > > Okay...what we could then do is have Kaboodle keep its > > own logfile, which recorded the real source IP, using the same > > timestamp that's in the WinVNC log file itself. KaboodlePad.exe > > could then merge the two pieces of data. > > > > Also, I want to make this change: users are still asking > > for an easy way to get the VNC service to listen to port-80. So > > lets add an "Autostart Now" button to the server PropertyTab. If > > the user does not have "Let Kaboodle auto start VNC" selected, > > then this button is greyed out. If the user has it selected, when > > they click it any running VNC service is stopped and VNC is then > > restarted with the current settings. > > > > thanks, > > Scott > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > The thing you offer could be a best decision, but that not possible. > > > The VNC server opens the log file in monopoly mode for writing. > > > If Kaboodle tries to open that file for writing also, then > > > the system error (error code 32) occurs > > > "The process cannot access the file > > > because it is being used by another process." > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:36 AM > > > Subject: Re: WinVNC log file > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > Was looking at this tonight. Would it be possible to > > > > replace any occurances of 127.0.0.1 with the IP address of > > > > the machine Kaboodle was tunneling from? That is, since it's > > > > Kaboodle doing the tunneling, it should be able to report: > > > > > > > > - Connection Source: Kaboodle tunnelled from 192.168.1.129 > > > > > > > > That'd be more useful, clearly. Since other apps > > > > besides Kaboodle can tunnel VNC connections, I was thinking > > > > that we could have Kaboodle itself write directly into the > > > > WinVNC.log file, using some specially tagged data, and then > > > > KaboodlePad could look for that data when it saw 127.0.0.1. > > > > > > > > Interested in your thoughts. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > I found 2 problems of WinVNC log file. > > > > > > > > > > 1. If VNC server starts and finds that WinVNC.log file already > exists, > > > > > then VNC server renames current WinVNC.log file into WinVNC.log.bak > > > file. > > > > > If WinVNC.log.bak already exists, then VNC server removes current > > > > > WinVNC.log.bak file. > > > > > > > > > > 2. I found that only debug level = 9 provides data about > unsuccessful > > > > > connections. > > > > > But that data isn't sufficient. > > > > > There absent information about *IP address* of unsuccessful > connection - > > > > > D:\ORL\vss\winvnc\vncServer.cpp : removing unauthorised client. > > > > > I can guess that it was last attempt of connection only. > > > > > But that not safely. > > > > > > > > > > You can see my changes of in the CVS server. > > > > > KaboodlePad now shows data like next > > > > > - Connection Start Time: Mon Aug 19 16:59:46 2002 > > > > > - Connection Success: YES > > > > > - Connection Source: 127.0.0.1 > > > > > - Connection End Time: Mon Aug 19 16:59:57 2002 > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:43 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: WinVNC log file > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > > > I hope another debug level gives you what we need: a > > > > > > timstamp, a viewer IP address, success status. > > > > > > > > > > > > On another note, I found a new bug. I installed Kaboodle > > > > > > on a machine that has a VNC viewer installed, but not a VNC > > > > > > server. Kaboodle wouldn't let me even "browse" for the viewer. > > > > > > It probably just didn't find VNC in the registry and so greys > > > > > > out every option. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > > > You wrote: > > > > > > > > what they *want* > > > > > > > > to see in a "VNC log" is one entry per connection: > > > > > > > I found that WinVNC.log file doesn't provide necessary data > always. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example, I made only VNC scan port number. > > > > > > > I found in the log file only 2 strings: > > > > > > > - D:\ORL\vss\winvnc\vncSockConnect.cpp : accepted connection > from > > > > > > > 192.168.1.225 > > > > > > > - D:\ORL\vss\winvnc\vncClient.cpp : client connected : > 192.168.1.225 > > > (1) > > > > > > > I can't understand that above connection wasn't success. > > > > > > > I can think that above connection continue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll research that problem. > > > > > > > I'll try to use another *debug level* of WinVnc registry > settings. > > > > > > > (But as result of big debug level, WinVnc log file will be very > > > big). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:31 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: WinVNC log file > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > > > > > if we stay with #1, then I think we should modify > > > > > > > > KaboodlePad.exe. I've asked many users, and what they *want* > > > > > > > > to see in a "VNC log" is one entry per connection: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------- > > > > > > > > Connection Start Time: 15 Aug 2002, xx:yy:zz > > > > > > > > Connection Success: YES/NO > > > > > > > > Connection Source: 192.168.1.12 > > > > > > > > Connection End Time: 15 Aug 2002, xx:yy:zz > > > > > > > > --------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if we stay with #1, we should change how KaboodlePad > > > > > > > > "parses" the information that WinVNC writes into the log file. > > > > > > > > There's a lot of gunk in there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your modifications to the "current working directory" > > > > > > > > are good -- now Kaboodle at least knows where the file is > > > > > > > > reliably. If it can't find the file, please change the > messageBox > > > > > > > > that comes up to read: "Please help Kaboodle find the file > > > > > > > > "WinVNC.log". Right now, it doesn't say what filename the user > > > > > > > > is supposed to browse for. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > > > > > I prefer thing #1 for WinVNC log file. > > > > > > > > > Real WinVNC log file describes connections more fully. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I looked into the source code of WinVnc and found following. > > > > > > > > > WinVnc creates log file as "WinVNC.log" without any path. > > > > > > > > > Therefore that file creates into the current working > directory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now before starting WinVnc Kaboodle > > > > > > > > > - saves current working directory, > > > > > > > > > - changes current working directory as WinVNC installation > > > > > directory. > > > > > > > > > After starting WinVnc Kaboodle restores previous working > > > directory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:33 AM > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Kaboodle-devel] Release build problem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > > > > > > > You're right that VNC server discovery, particularly > > > > > > > > > > in Win98, has become less reliable. As Jeff suggested, it > may > > > > > > > > > > be interesting to try a heap walker or bound checker to > see if > > > > > > > > > > we can isolate the cause. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On a related subject, I was hoping you could modify > > > > > > > > > > the behavior of the "log VNC usage" button. Right now all > it > > > > > > > > > > does is set the registry entry for WinVNC. Problem is, > when > > > > > > > > > > I hit "View Log" it never finds the file, I always have to > > > > > > > > > > browse for it. I was hoping you could do one of two > things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Have the WinVNC log be written into the installation > dir, > > > > > > > > > > and have ViewLog always look there first. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Alternatively, don't use WinVNC log at all. Kaboodle > has > > > > > > > > > > its own debug info now that's written to > > > VncServerSessionLog > > > > > > > > > > when built in Debug mode. Perhaps we could output some > (not > > > > > > > > > > all) of that info into a .txt file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The intent with logging was for the user to be able to > > > > > > > > > > find out who connected, or tried and failed to connect, to > > > their > > > > > > > > > > VNC server. All it needs to show are timestamps, IP > address of > > > > > > > > > > the Viewer, and connection status (failed, connected, > > > > > disconnected, > > > > > > > > > > etc). Unfortunately, the debug info shows a whole lot more > > > than > > > > > > > > > > just that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps we could combine both: if the user has "Log > > > > > > > > > > VNC usage" we could both set the debug flag in the VNC > > > registry, > > > > > > > > > > *and* record Kaboodle-detected info. So if someone > connected > > > > > > > > > > directly, we could show that from grep'ing the VNC log > file. > > > > > > > > > > If someone connected via Kaboodle, we could show that > > > directly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eager for your thoughts. I suppose getting #1 to work > > > > > > > > > > above would be sufficient for the needs of 0.90. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > > > > > > > I see that VNC server discovery has become less > reliable. > > > > > > > > > > > That unreliability shows itself in release build, > > > particularly > > > > > in > > > > > > > Win98 > > > > > > > > > OS. > > > > > > > > > > > It isn't possible that one of my recent updates broke > > > > > something - > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't changed something pertaining to that part. > > > > > > > > > > > Here is what I have found. > > > > > > > > > > > Now VNC discovery sometimes cannot create a client > socket > > > for > > > > > scan > > > > > > > port. > > > > > > > > > > > I see the system error's code 10055. > > > > > > > > > > > That error has following text > > > > > > > > > > > "An operation on a socket could not be performed because > > > > > > > > > > > the system lacked sufficient buffer space or because a > queue > > > was > > > > > > > full". > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like another thread simultaneously makes big > lot of > > > > > socket > > > > > > > > > work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is what I can implement for the button "Check > Again" > > > only. > > > > > > > > > > > If VNC server discovery receives above error code 10055, > > > > > > > > > > > then it waits 0.3 second and repeats the operation one > more > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that the button "Check Again" will be > more > > > > > reliable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot implement above check error code 10055 for VNC > > > server > > > > > > > discovery > > > > > > > > > > > at the first start Kaboodle (empty registry setting). > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that it is uselessly in that case. > > > > > > > > > > > We have to find and fix the reason of error code 10055. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:37 AM > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Kaboodle-devel] Release build problem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > > > > > > > > > Your changes look good. I noticed one thing though: it > > > > > > > > > > > > seems as if the VNC server discovery has become less > > > reliable > > > > > > > > > > > > since you made these changes. Sometimes it takes two > or > > > three > > > > > > > > > > > > "Check Again" tries for it to find the VNC server one > one > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > my machines. It used to catch it right away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is in release build, latest stuff. Is it possible > > > > > > > > > > > > that one of the recent updates broke something? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I inserted exact your texts > > > > > > > > > > > > > into the top of "VNC setup" tab in the device icon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now only the "Check Again" button is active > > > > > > > > > > > > > if VNC connection is not possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I found that Kaboodle saves special debug data > into > > > the > > > > > log > > > > > > > > > files > > > > > > > > > > > > > - KaboodleNIDPreAlpha.xml, > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Kaboodle_Dbg.htm, > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Gnutella.log. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That files appeared both in debug and release > builds. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that files appear in debug build only. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:28 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Kaboodle-devel] Release build problem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good, thanks; VNC tunneling is working again > nicely. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only bug I can find right now: when I'm on PC1 and > I > > > open > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > device icon for PC2 (which is not running a VNC > > > service) > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > says at the top "when connecting to <b>PC2</b> > from > > > > > > > <b>PC1></b> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use these settings". It *used* to say "PC2 is not > > > running > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VNC Service" and only the "Check Again" button was > > > active. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did that get changed somehow? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found next VNC problem: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - PC1 run independent VNC service; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - PC1 run Kaboodle with option "Enable Kaboodle > > > Tunnels > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > VNC"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - I open PC1 device icon on PC2 machine and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > try to start up "Connect through Kaboodle". That > > > > > connection > > > > > > > > > failed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found conflict in port number: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - independent VNC service on PC1 listen some > port > > > > > number. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That number by default is 5900. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (it is number by default); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Kaboodle on PC1 reads port number of VNC > viewer > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uses it for start up VNC viewer,... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That number by default is 5900 also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that bug fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before start "Connection through Kaboodle" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaboodle on the viewer side make check: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if there is running independent VNC server on > the > > > port > > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > > > > N_VNC_SERVER, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then port for start VNC viewer cannot be same as > > > > > > > N_VNC_SERVER > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and same as port, which use for tunnel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I continue test Kaboodle in release and debug > mode. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see that Kaboodle works both in release and > debug > > > > > mode. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you will find any VNC bug, please send me > next > > > log > > > > > files > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - SessionVncServerLog.txt, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - SessionVncViewerLog.txt, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - ViewerThreadLog.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for both Kaboodles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About port number 7000. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaboodle always listens TCP connection on port > > > number > > > > > 7000. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please see > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/16728/2002/5/0/8657977/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If PC1 need to start independent VNC server on > PC2, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then PC1 send special message to the PC2 on port > > > number > > > > > > > 7000. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also that port used for initialization "File > > > Transfer". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > > > > > > > > > "mailbox" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 9:17 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Kaboodle-devel] Release build > problem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igor: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree that the Release builds are not > working > > > right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now. However, even in Debug mode, I cannot get > VNC > > > > > > > tunneling > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to work anymore. So I used WinCVS to get a > code > > > > > snapshot > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > August-8, so that VK's NID-synch bugs were not > > > > > involved. > > > > > > > Still > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't work. Details: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. I'm running the VNC server on PC1, WinNT, > debug > > > > > build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No VNC service is active, Kaboodle is setup to > > > > > "autostart > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > needed". On PC2, running Win2k, in the Device > Icon > > > for > > > > > > > PC1, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the VNC Setup tab, "Connect Directly" is > greyed > > > out. > > > > > Since > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no server is running on PC1, both choices > should > > > be > > > > > > > active. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Then on PC2 I open the VNC Service Icon, > and go > > > to > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list of viewers. I enter the password for PC1, > hit > > > > > > > connect. I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > immediately get an error from VNC "Cannot > connect > > > to > > > > > > > server". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Over on PC1, the VNC server icon is in my > service > > > > > tray, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's lit-up, indicating it's receiving a > > > connection. > > > > > The > > > > > > > log > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > file on PC1 has just two lines: "BEGIN: > > > > > StartVNCServer" > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "StartVNCServer: Ok start Independent > VNCserver > > > port > > > > > > > number > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5900". I look at the tcpdump traffic on my > LAN, > > > and > > > > > see > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > following. When I hit connect: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 16:36:57.351343 192.168.123.134.1189 > > > > > > > > 192.168.123.130.7000: S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2008127198:2008127198(0) win 16384 <mss > > > > > > > 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> > > > > > > > > > (DF) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the above, PC1 is .130 and PC2 is .134. Why > > > would > > > > > port > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7000 be involved in a VNC tunnel? I wait a few > > > seconds > > > > > to > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > port the VNC viewer on PC2 is trying to use. > Keep > > > in > > > > > mind > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Connect Directly" was not a valid choice: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 16:36:57.807921 192.168.123.134.1190 > > > > > > > > 192.168.123.130.5900: S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2008283092:2008283092(0) win 16384 <mss > > > > > > > 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> > > > > > > > > > (DF) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So PC2 has tried to connect directly, even > though > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaboodle on PC1 has opened a tunnel and > connected > > > > > > > successfully > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the VNC server (which is why the VNC icon > in > > > the > > > > > > > service > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tray is lit-up bright white). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. I then try connecting again from PC2. I get > a > > > > > Kaboodle > > > > > > > > > error > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "You already have a VNC session > > > connected > > > > > with > > > > > > > PC1". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for looking into this. I was very > surprised > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > port-7000 got involved with this connection > > > attempt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tested all my changes in both debug > and > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > builds. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All worked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then I merged my code with CVS code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now Kaboodle works in debug builds only. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a problem in realise build - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaboodle starts, but a user don't see GUI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found a problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please look into the function int > > > > > > > CEFController::Start(). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a line > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > while > (!m_pNetworkManager->bStartUpFinished); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that there is infinite loop > in > > > > > realize > > > > > > > build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The member > m_pNetworkManager->bStartUpFinished > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sets as "TRUE" in the function > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > int CNetworkManager::OnStartup(DWORD > > > nIDController, > > > > > > > CGUID > > > > > > > > > > > > > KaboodleID). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems like that function don't works > > > correctly in > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaboodle-devel mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Kaboodle-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel