[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Hi rob !
[The first part of this email is about licensing stuff, the last bit is
more interesting ;)]
I believe that Helmer, Guilhem, and Dalibor have all done various things
to the verifier's code since my last relicensing, which means, I believe,
that I need their permission this time around. I went through the
ChangeLogs and didn't find anyone else mentioned, but I wanted to make
sure on this list, as it's possible that I missed a small contribution
(the ChangeLogs are mighty long these days).
For my part, I haven't done anything on the verifier apart from fixing
one isolated pointer. So please do what you want with your code. :)
Anyway, I don't want to pressure anyone into doing anything contrary to
their convictions. If you have contributed, and you feel strongly about
the GPL and so don't want to give permission to relicense, then I'm
content to continue working on Kaffe's verifier and not relicense it.
However, I think it ultimately benefits more people if I have the ability
to give what is mostly my work to whomever will find it useful.
In other news, Helmer created a patch that seems to fix the Circular
Linking Bug in the class loader I reported earlier (Thanks!). I've been
really busy and haven't had much time to play with it, but when the
patched kaffe is run with -verifyremote as an option I am able to run lots
of big programs. As soon as things like Eclipse, Ant, etc., work with
-verifyremote (just a couple small bugs to iron out, nothing really major
has been popping up), I suggest that we turn verification on by default in
the CVS head. Objections?
If it is working I'm all for it. :)
Cheers,
Guilhem.
_______________________________________________
kaffe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
