Prefer A, but ok with B.
Thanks,
Neha
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The original code was in the style
> for(x <- lst) {..}
> A lot of newer code looks like
> for (x <- lst) {...}
> Some code also occasionally does
> for ( x <- lst ) {...}
>
> This is not a big deal but because I am obsessive compulsive I must make
> all whitespace in a given file consistent. This results in big patches with
> mostly trivial changes. Can we standardize on one of the above and
> opportunistically convert towards it?
>
> Let's call the above A, B, and C respectively. I vote for A, but am pretty
> cool with B too.
>
> -Jay
