I am a fan of consistency
http://twitter.github.com/effectivescala/ works for me though I a don't
have a strong opinion to using this or another but we need to have a
consensus!
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also liked Prashanth's suggestion of standardizing a few other aspects of
> style.
>
> One option would be to just adopt an existing style guide off the shelf.
> There is one from twitter and a few other places. I think that might be an
> easy way to go. We could use whatever whitespace style they have.
>
> If we want to do a custom style guide then I guess we should just file a
> JIRA to improve the existing style guidelines and try to get consensus on
> various aspects.
>
> -Jay
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Not sure if we reached any consensus here. It seems like a tie: 3 votes
> for
> > A and 3 votes for B. Any other people want to chime in to break the tie
> :)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The original code was in the style
> > > for(x <- lst) {..}
> > > A lot of newer code looks like
> > > for (x <- lst) {...}
> > > Some code also occasionally does
> > > for ( x <- lst ) {...}
> > >
> > > This is not a big deal but because I am obsessive compulsive I must
> make
> > > all whitespace in a given file consistent. This results in big patches
> > with
> > > mostly trivial changes. Can we standardize on one of the above and
> > > opportunistically convert towards it?
> > >
> > > Let's call the above A, B, and C respectively. I vote for A, but am
> > pretty
> > > cool with B too.
> > >
> > > -Jay
> > >
> >
>
--
/*
Joe Stein
http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
*/
