Hi Steve,
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 01:20:59 Steve wrote: > Thank you for the supportive reply. I must admit it was disheartening > to see 6 small patches go for over a week without any comments from > anyone. It's also been a little embarrassing telling colleagues > looking at my application code that to run it they not only need to > pull a fresh subversion tree but they also need to manually patch it > as well. I'll ensure that I merge the patches onto a branch tonight for review and merge (unless someone else offers to do so first). > I can understand longer delays between feature based releases, but it > would be great if there was at least a way to streamline getting > corrective fixes into subversion. I think there's two things that need to change here really to make things easier: a license change to BSD (or BSD like - either MIT or Apache license), and also a clearer simpler description of what needs doing - ie about enabling code to actually get into the code tree. The current process is more of a barrier than it should be, and needs tweaking. Michael. -- http://yeoldeclue.com/blog http://twitter.com/kamaelian http://www.kamaelia.org/Home --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kamaelia" group. To post to this group, send email to kamaelia@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to kamaelia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
