Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We should use the same filed name of CREDITS e.g. D: for Description.
> (maybe you can invert D: description and T: time of last update)
Good point.
> It whould nice also if we include the type of the license (GPL,...).
> This for a fast parsing (and maybe also to replace the few lines
> of license)
Is there any kernel code that isn't GPLed?
> Instead of C: it is more important (IMHO) to include the module name.
That we get from the name of the file we're visiting, I think.
> Maybe we can include both (modules name are always lower case).
> I think that the inclusion of the config option is not important (
> considering that it can be easily parsed from the kaos' new makefiles).
Interesting point. Maybe that field should drop out once we transition.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you.
-- Ramsey Clark
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
