> Well, would it be possible to create some module under LGPL, and then > have included it into the kernel? Maybe it needs to maintain the LGPL > version out of the kernel, and transform a copy to the GPL before > submitting? There is kernel code under a whole variety of licenses. When linked together the resulting work is GPL but many of the pieces used on their own or in conjunction with different code are not GPL. Alan _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
- [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attrib... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... Giacomo A. Catenazzi
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a ... Giacomo A. Catenazzi
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... Horst von Brand
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a ... Giacomo A. Catenazzi
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... mirabilos
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... Markus Schaber
- Alan Cox