On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Alan, if MAINTAINERS scaled perfectly I wouldn't have had to spend > three months just trying to figure out who was reponsible for each of > the [Cc]onfig.in files. And even with that amount of effort mostly > failing. I have a much simpler proposal, which appears to solve your immediate problem, and would keep most people happy -- add a: C: CONFIG_SCSI_BLARG tag to MAINTAINERS. If you _really_ insist, add an: F: drivers/scsi/blarg.c F: drivers/scsi/blarg.h too. It removes the ambiguity inherent in the current system, without adding an overengineered solution with no obvious advantages. Matthew. _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... David Woodhouse
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Rik van Riel
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better a... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Matthew Kirkwood
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Francois Romieu
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Alexander Viro
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Matthew Kirkwood
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Alexander Viro
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Eric S. Raymond
- [kbuild-devel] Re: Request for comment -- a better attrib... Horst von Brand