On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE > > > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide? > > Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour > can come later - that shouldn't be done at the same time as introducing CML2.
Yes, but what I was getting at was that these constraints will change (either because they were incorrect or no longer aplicable). Either way, why not fix bugs now? (since there are non-PCI/ISA ide, which is why I kept that example to start with). -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
