On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE
>
> > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide?
>
> Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour
> can come later - that shouldn't be done at the same time as introducing CML2.
Existing rules allow non-PCI/ISA IDE. Its a bug, not a change of
behaviour.
--
Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
