Right now I'm using a Fusebox app for two reasons. 1-My project is adapted from another that was written in Fusebox by someone else, and 2-Fusebox is a very structured method that I've been meaning to tinker with for some time.
Kory Bakken from Nations subscribes to this list, and they use Fusebox there. He's better qualified to speak about Fusebox's strengths. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Form failure within Fusebox > > > What is the point of using something like Fusebox or MachII? > > Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield > Realtor > www.bobwakefield.net ========================================================= Kansas City ColdFusion User Group's website & listserv is hosted through the generous support of Clickdoug.com To send email to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To (un)subscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your request. For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1. ======================================================
