https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518109
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zhuravlov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Poelen from comment #3) > which specification(s) is this definition based on? I found it unattainable to stick with particular definition, moreover when you want to limit yourself in the number of file extensions used. So I've selected most common features from BNF, EBNF (ISO/IEC 14977), ABNF (RFC2234) and WBNF specs, and file extensions ".bnf" and ".ebnf" only. BTW, features supported by this proposal include most of RBNF (RFC5511). Another consideration was that the syntax highlighter should be more simple rather than precise to cover most common cases. > It seems to me that it corresponds to META II, TREE-META and BNF (rfc5511) No, it doesn't correspond to META II and TREE-META since they are very different. I've provided a particular highlighters for them, see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518110 and https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518112 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
