https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447656
--- Comment #7 from tomash...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 144973 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=144973&action=edit Trash configuration does not have a shortcut, as far as I can see. And neither have I found it in the system settings. I mean, it is not a big deal, I can set up a shortcut for "dolphin ~/.local/share/Trash/files". I am more discussing the general logic of enumerating the launchers: 1) First, application launchers (like Application Dashboard and Application Menu seem to have a unique treatment and whichever was added as the last to the panel gets to be launched by the super key). But they are not skipped when enumerating the other launchers, so it leads to weird gaps (as the list starting with "2" I mentioned earlier). I think they should be skipped (and I kind of thing this is more a bug then a feature). 2) In general, any applet that has assigned a shortcut tries to show that shortcut. However, it only seems to show the last key of the shortcut. I added "Backup Stats" and assignedd CTRL+3 to it. When I longpress Super, there are now two launchers that show "3". Rather confusing. Not sure how to deal with the UI to show the modifier, with very long shortcuts, that could get messy. I also think this is a bug (a minor one). 3) As the number of icons on the dock is variable (I can launch an app that I do not have pinned to the dock), when used with the justify splitters, the icons that are not dynamic (trash in my example) gets a dynamic shortcut, for me a bit counterintuitively - it definitely does not help with mnemonics. But I can see that this is probably an issue with the trash applet because it cannot be assigned a shortcut because. However, a feature to allow assigning shortcuts from the last to the first would help with this. About the RTL support, I guess it would make sense to automatically pick if the system is RTL and then enumerate it in that way, but I do not understand RTL so I will let it be. But really this is not such a big deal to me, the first two issues are more definitely akward in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
