There were (and probably still are) KDE apps available in the N9 app store for a fee. So, it's not new, and I don't see any problem with it.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Sune Vuorela <nos...@vuorela.dk> wrote: > On 2014-02-19, Agustin benito bethencourt <aben...@kde.org> wrote: >> I must confess though that I am worry about the association between: >> * proprietary platforms = commercial >> * free platforms = non commercial >> >> that might be implied from this model. > > I understood it that it was 'source code is free software and it is > available over there => <link>' 'My binaries available from over there > => <otherlink> costs money to be fully used'. > > I agree that I might worry about what Augustin is writing. But I have no > issue with people charging for their binary builds of free software, > and I'm pretty sure that others, including RMS, Redhat and others would > be okay for such a business model. (I of course assume that you still > live up to the license) > > You can probably also hire half of the people on this list to build > windows installers for you - for a fee. > > /Sune > > _______________________________________________ > kde-community mailing list > kde-community@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community