On 2014-02-19, Agustin benito bethencourt <aben...@kde.org> wrote: > I must confess though that I am worry about the association between: > * proprietary platforms = commercial > * free platforms = non commercial > > that might be implied from this model.
I understood it that it was 'source code is free software and it is available over there => <link>' 'My binaries available from over there => <otherlink> costs money to be fully used'. I agree that I might worry about what Augustin is writing. But I have no issue with people charging for their binary builds of free software, and I'm pretty sure that others, including RMS, Redhat and others would be okay for such a business model. (I of course assume that you still live up to the license) You can probably also hire half of the people on this list to build windows installers for you - for a fee. /Sune _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
