Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > El Dimecres, 30 d'abril de 2014, a les 21:36:14, Jaroslaw Staniek va escriure: >> [..] >> >> I'd like to say thank you to everyone that shares personal opinion. Here's >> mine. >> >> (While reading this please note that geek power users isn't a primary >> audience for apps I am contributing to) >> >> - 3 - >> >> At project management level please also note a word from a Calligra >> contributor. The project is so huge that there's even lack of manpower >> for maintaining change logs or feature guides. Even specification of >> essential file formats take thousands of pages combined. 400+ dialogs. >> 400 services/types/plugins. I don't think syncing with joint releases >> wouldn't add to the manpower. I would avoid anything that narrows >> contributor base and user base. >> Secondly, our choice of release schedule for Calligra is already >> result of a nontrivial compromise. It's complex even now while we do >> not have released our Frameworks to the public, something that in my >> opinion can be expected as our differentiator. > > Do you believe that splitting Calligra into something like 10 different > releases would actually help with the lack of manpower? > > I have the feeling that it would probably help "the big guys", but I don't > think it'd have a global positive "value" for all the projects that compose > Calligra at the moment. > > But that is my "I have no clue about Calligra" opinion so I'd value yours :)
I think there is a bit of confusion: the proposal about "unified release" is about the Application part of KDE SC + any other application which would join. A big project like Calligra is independent enough and it can have a separate schedule as it is now. Did I get it right? Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
