On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12.34:35 Martin Klapetek wrote: > That's not what I implied though, I just said that I think we should have a > dedicated mailing list for frameworks users, in no way I said it will get > us more users.
I will simply quote your own email: "We want frameworks to spread throughout the world and we want people using it everywhere; I think we should have a proper, standalone support contact point for these developers, which is not loaded with other KDE devel stuff." > And I still think that dedicated frameworks support mailing > list would be better than general purpose kde-devel. kde-devel is not general purpose. It is specifically for discussion of developing applications with KDE technical offerings, including the frameworks libraries. > Just out of curiosity - why do you think having a dedicated ML purely for > frameworks users would be such a bad idea? I don't think it is a bad idea. I think the definition of what "purely for frameworks" means has become unnecessarily and undesirably (even dangerously) narrow and that k-c-d and k-d serves the purpose for development-of and use-of perfectly. This comes at a time when both of those lists need revitalization, something which I'm suggesting would be well accomplished by returning to their original purposes. -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community