I reread both drafts and realized that people who have not participated in the development of these proposals might miss the important difference between them.
The Lydia & Co see KDE providing users free software to manage any aspect of their digital life: GUI environments, applications (GUI and not), knowledge management systems, etc. The AlexN. & Co see KDE providing users free GUI environments and applications that work on any computing device: desktop, laptop, tablet, smartphone, or any other device present and future. First proposal is internally called "inclusive", as it defines KDE as an entity that can include any free software project that shares its goals and wants to join the KDE community. Second proposal is internally called "focused", as it limits the focus of KDE to GUI software, but at the same time emphasizes that users should be able to use KDE software on all their devices. Both proposals aim at giving KDE a new direction. Inclusive proposal is about going breadth-first, focused - depth-first. PS: this summary is my opinion, and it is not endorsed by any of the two vision groups. _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community