On Monday, February 15, 2016 10:22:20 PM CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday, February 15, 2016 15:11:47 Martin Graesslin wrote: > ... > > > Maybe you could start thinking about that. What does it mean if THE GUI > > maintainer doesn't want that? Maybe he has a better look on it with THE > > GUI > > knowledge? > > > > Please don't completely dismiss my feedback. Think about it. > > Yes, but I have really a hard time understanding it. I'm actually assuming > there must be some misunderstanding, different bias or interpretation... > > If the future interfaces won't be graphical, what other options do you see ?
I'm not a prophet, I have no clue what will be after graphical interfaces. But some things we already see today emerging: speech for starters. Another example are all this Virtual Reality stuff which is not graphical in the sense of a GUI. Our phones notifies through vibration. We have smart watches interacting through sensors with the body. All without a GUI. There is a world beyond GUI. Things relevant to our users. Things relevant to privacy. I want KDE to be there, to give secure and privacy aware solutions also on future interaction patterns and not be limited by saying we only do GUI. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community