On Monday 08 February 2016 17:07:26 Alexander Dymo wrote: > > We define the goal for KDE not in technical terms, but in terms of > > Freedom, user control and privacy. > > I understand this part clearly. I just say that this goal is too > broadly defined, and, therefore hardly reachable by a single > organization like KDE.
I think you misunderstand what (the purpose of) a vision is. Let's look at an example. Oxfam's vision is "a just world without poverty". https://www.oxfam.org/en/our-purpose-and-beliefs This goal is hardly reachable by a single organization like Oxfam. > Most free software communities, including KDE, already work towards > that goal. Exactly. Just as many other NGOs are working towards the same goal as Oxfam. > Defining it in writing as the goal of KDE adds neither value nor > attractiveness to KDE as a project. Well, that's debatable (and I disagree with it), but I hope you agree that not defining it in writing as the goal of KDE can only reduce KDE's attractiveness (because some potential contributors might fail to see our goal and decide to join another community). I think your concern is that the vision does not function as differentiation from other free software communities. That's correct, but setting KDE apart from other free software communities is not the purpose of the vision. What differentiates us from other free software communities is not our goal, but the way we want to reach (resp. approach) this goal. And this way should be spelled out in the mission. Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
